Feilmargin på vintage Omega

My $0.02:

New watches should perform within 1-3 seconds a day, vintage ones (30-60 years old) should perform within 10-20 seconds a day. Older watches (pre-fifties), well, that is a different story.

This is reasonable I think, and especially for properly regulated Omega 500 movements. Even inferior movements can show such performances. My AS1701 in my Glycine perform within 10-20 seconds a day. My H-694A within 10-15 seconds a day. I have other examples as well with Valjoux and Venus movements.

Of course a movement could be worn or damaged in such a way that expected performance could exceed the 10-20 second range. In most cases, I don't believe that is the case. With proper service and exchange of parts, you still should expect a performance within 10-20 seconds.

It all boils down to costs, the way I see it. Who pays to get the watch properly regulated?



COSC apart, for me 30 seconds are in the higher echelons of what I personally find acceptable. But then again the double of that (a minute) should not be acceptable for a vintage watch from the fifties or the sixties. We are talking about the golden age of mechanical watches here.



Ah. You expats. Just love to poke fun at Norwegian peculiarities... ;)

Joke aside, we don't wear mechanical watches for accuracy. Plenty of digital watches take care of that. Bottom line though; a minute is too much.

Later, Jim.

:cool:
 

Thanks for the input, Arne. If you have 50 year old Omega Seamaster, even serviced, that runs + or - 6 seconds a day, you can always show it to Omega in Switzerland. They'll be amazed, and then you can get chronometer certification...:cool: